VoteClarity uses AI and an open ethical charter to evaluate political behaviour — transparently, impartially, and in alignment with fundamental human values.
VoteClarity doesn't decide morality. It measures observable political behaviour against a transparent, publicly-defined ethical charter — so anyone can scrutinise the reasoning.
We aggregate voting records from official parliamentary sources, cross-reference public statements with verified transcripts, and gather published policy proposals — all from primary or accredited sources only.
The Civic Integrity Engine applies rule-based classification and AI-assisted analysis across five scoring dimensions. Claims are cross-checked. All AI judgements are logged. Disputed cases go to human review.
Politicians receive a 0–100 alignment score with a full breakdown by category, supporting evidence, and a plain-language explanation. Every score is contestable. Politicians can submit rebuttals.
How votes in parliament align with the Charter's principles across key policy areas.
Truthfulness, consistency, and absence of documented disinformation.
Published legislative proposals evaluated for rights-alignment and societal impact.
Financial disclosures, ethics investigations, conflicts of interest, verified misconduct.
Behaviour during emergencies: respect for rule of law, civil liberties, proportionality of response.
All weightings are published in the VoteClarity Charter and are subject to community review. Weights may be adjusted via a governed process — never unilaterally.
These are illustrative example profiles. Real scores are generated from verified public data sources. Each score includes a full evidence trail.
The Charter defines what we measure and why. Grounded in the European Convention on Human Rights and compassionate ethical principles, it is the cornerstone of everything VoteClarity does.
Every person is evaluated under the same framework, regardless of party, ideology, or nation. Politicians are assessed on how consistently their actions uphold the equal dignity of all people.
We track alignment with protections for free speech, freedom of movement, privacy rights, and freedom of assembly — core rights enshrined in the ECHR and international law.
Verified disinformation, contradictions between public statements and actions, and failures of financial disclosure all directly affect a politician's score. Truthfulness is measurable.
We evaluate support for proportional, lawful, and internationally-compliant security policy. Incitement to violence or disproportionate use of force is flagged and scored accordingly.
Do politicians support independent judicial oversight? Do they comply with court decisions? Do they undermine democratic checks and balances? These are scored with documented evidence.
Inspired by the principle of caring for future generations, we assess policies on climate, public health, and social cohesion — evaluating whether decisions prioritise short-term gain over long-term wellbeing.
VoteClarity is structured so that the data, the AI evaluation, and the ethical values are always kept separate, transparent, and independently auditable.
The public-facing platform. Search any politician, view their score and breakdown, compare candidates before an election, and access the evidence behind every judgement. Free, always.
The AI evaluation system. Aggregates verified public data, applies rule-based and AI-assisted classification, cross-checks claims, and produces weighted scores with logged reasoning. All AI decisions are auditable.
The ethical foundation. Defines every principle used for evaluation. Based on international human rights law and compassionate ethics. Fully public, versioned, and open to structured community input. No private changes, ever.
Enter a name, country, or political role to view their VoteClarity evaluation. All scores include a full evidence breakdown.
Currently covering 47 countries · 2,400+ evaluated officials · Updated weekly